Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century
Legal letter from Robert Barnes:
Compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law.
First, federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the “option to accept or refuse administration” of the Covid-19 vaccine. ( … .edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3″ target=”_blank” class=”link” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3 ) This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must “be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision” for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).
Secondly, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).)
Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. ( https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine ). The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.( https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html )
Employee of the Year
What it Takes
Identifying the perfect pre-established template for complete comprehensive thought is pre-requisite to freedom
*Declaration Below Courtesy of Dr. Francis Boyle (Harvard University)
.Rocco Galati BA, LL.B, LL.M …reducing irrational subjective belief with objective reason
IF STOPPED ON THE STREET.
pursuant to the police services Act which does not allow
the police to just arbitrarily collect information, you know he can’t just got cross examine you
as if under a Catholic inquisition, so you have no duty to give information to police.
If they then say, “Gonna do a ticket” say go ahead.
If they ask for your address you have no duty to answer the question. You have a right to remain silent right that’s the whole point and if they threaten to arrest you ask why,
You have no duty to answer police officer’s question
“What’s your reason for arresting me, you have to tell me.” They may say obstruction well they know obstruction under the criminal code says
the police can’t use the provisions of the criminal code in enforcing a bylaw
or provincial regulation even if purported crime is under health regulations.
NOTE: Reference to ‘person’ in Section 7 is not defined as a corporate entity subject to contractual agreement because the living man or woman stands under fundamental common law superseding all other laws.
As the human spirit awakens the only other way to remove the foundation of human rights (which is innate to the structure of the human body psyche) legally is to alter the human genome so every man, woman and child becomes the property of the technocratic elite (just like gmo seeds).
Truth, equality and freedom is essential because it’s integral to the innate structure of the human body psyche.
State of emergency requires valid reason, and if all reasons prove invalid (case-demic is not a pandemic) the only conclusion that can be drawn is there’s ulterior motive in removing your human rights.
How you can lawfully protect yourself, your family and your business by disconnecting from unlawful laws which don’t serve best interests of the people. Common law expert John Smith is a must-watch for those who want to end the deceit of corporate law which has been designating human beings as property of the state thru the trickery of legalese.
If asked if you are the ‘person’ on your driver’s licence (which in legalese refers to you as a corporate entity in contractual agreement with the state) say “No, that is the legal entity, I am a living man (or woman) and stand under natural common law, I do not consent.”
All legal authority govern by contractual consent, so as a living man or woman you have a choice, because enforcement of statuary laws by government, police, etc. depends on your consent to become a designated legal entity referred to as a ‘person’ in legalese (as a replacement for a living breathing human being). Only if you consent to become a legal entity does legislation carry the full force of law.
Bottom line is all governments are corporations and can only enforce laws by your contractual agreement. The problem is currently you and every human being is now designated as a legal entity, a (lifeless) corporation. That’s why it’s necessary to publicly declare you are a living breathing man or woman to escape unlawful statuary laws.
Common Law Court website | Governments, Agencies, Law Enforcement, Courts and Institutions are Corporations | Attention All Law Enforcement | Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms | Constitutional Rights Centre